At IEEE S&P 2023, Puschner et al. made a valuable dataset for hardware Trojan detection research publicly available. It contains a complete set of SEM images of four different digital IC fabricated at progressively smaller semiconductor technology nodes. Puschner et al. reported preliminary evidence that feature sizes affect Trojan detection performance, but they were unable to disentangle effects caused by insertion strategies or by degrading image quality from those intrinsic to the underlying standard cell libraries. Distinguishing those causes, however, is crucial to understand whether improved tooling (e.g., higher resolution imaging equipment) can remove the observed technology bias, or whether susceptibility to stealthy hardware Trojans is indeed an inherent property of a cell library.

In this talk, we dive deep into the S&P 2023 dataset to answer these questions.
We first show that, using Puschner et al.'s metrics, such a separation is indeed difficult to establish.
We then present alternative metrics to more meaningfully assess and compare the potential susceptibility of standard cell libraries. We find clear differences between the evaluated libraries.
However, in all cases we identify cells that implement distinct logic functions yet are visually indistinguishable in SEM images. Our results demonstrate that cell libraries can - and should - be evaluated for their potential "Trojanizability", and we recommend practical defenses.